|
|
Enron Mail |
Steve,
I am most disheartened to hear that Dale Neuner regards my previous conversation with he and Mark Taylor as the justification for why EOL cannot accomodate GPG pipeline capacity transactions. During the discussion in Mark's office, Dale explained that currently all EOL users can run reports and see all the details of transactions. As currently structured this would mean that any EOL user, including ENA, would be able to run a report to see detail behind bids on pipeline capacity. Obviously this would be a problem under the marketing affiliate rules. We discussed three possible ways to address this: Add security such that ENA/EES users cannot run reports on pipeline bid data. I understood leaving the meeting that this might be technically difficult or expensive. Exclude pipeline data from the reporting feature altogether. Here the story was that while this was not necessarily difficult, EOL could not make any changes before version 2 was ready. The impression was that this would be possible after version 2. Erect procedural firewalls. Mark Taylor suggested that perhaps we could inform all ENA and EES personnel that the company has a policy that prevents them from running reports on GPG data. This probably isn't a good long-run solution, but we all agreed that it might serve as a bridge measure. This approach is supported by the fact that Enron Networks has already entered into a confidentiality agreement with GPG. I left the meeting thinking that one or all of these options was feasible and have not had any correspondence to the contrary since the meeting.
|