Enron Mail

From:paul.goddard@enron.com
To:simon.hastings@enron.com
Subject:Re: Spectron Update & Response
Cc:andy.zipper@enron.com, richard.lewis@enron.com, dave.samuels@enron.com,amita.gosalia@enron.com, justin.boyd@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com
Bcc:andy.zipper@enron.com, richard.lewis@enron.com, dave.samuels@enron.com,amita.gosalia@enron.com, justin.boyd@enron.com, mark.taylor@enron.com
Date:Fri, 19 Jan 2001 04:24:00 -0800 (PST)

Simon - Justin tells me that in his view there are no issues from a UK
legal/regulatory point of view , other than the following:

As a matter of 'best pratice', the broker(s) concerned should mention
somewhere in their terms and conditions that their 'commission may or may not
be shared with third parties' in order to comply with SFA rules

Hope this helps.
---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Goddard/EU/Enron on 19/01/2001 12:20
---------------------------
From: Paul Goddard on 19/01/2001 11:09
To: Justin Boyd/LON/ECT@ECT
cc: Dave Samuels/hou/ect@ect, Amita Gosalia/LON/ECT@ECT

Subject: Re: Spectron Update & Response

Justin - any thoughts re: Simon's question? Would we still be within our
legal and regulatory rights to accepting a 'cut' of a broker's commission
fees, assuming we ended up doing what Simon suggests as opposed to the
EnronBrokerConnect approach (different business/revenue model)?

Thanks,
Paul

---------------------- Forwarded by Paul Goddard/EU/Enron on 19/01/2001 10:59
---------------------------


Simon Hastings@ECT
19/01/2001 09:56
To: Andy Zipper/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc: Richard Lewis/LON/ECT@ECT, Paul Goddard/EU/Enron@Enron

Subject: Re: Spectron Update & Response


Andy

Actually what I was referring to was a deal between UK Power and GFI Net,
which would not necessarily involve EOL.
There would be several benefits for us to do this, as detailed in my previous
mail.

My question is: Do you know of any issues that would prevent us from
accepting a per trade payment (passthrough of a % of bro) from GFI? If not,
do you know who has looked at this sort of thing?

Thanks
Simon




Andy Zipper@ENRON
18/01/2001 21:09
To: Simon Hastings/LON/ECT@ECT
cc:

Subject: Re: Spectron Update & Response

Simon,

Re GFI:

We had been discussing an EnronBrokerConnect license for them. This is the
deal whereby they get a stripped down EOL web client that allows them to
transact on behalf of customers. This was initiated on behalf of the
Conntinental Power desk. GFI has been un responsive to date.

If they have changed tack and want to put EOL numbers on the GFInet site they
need to let me know that. So far it's been tough dealing with these guys.

Andy