![]() |
Enron Mail |
any luck on this?
---------------------- Forwarded by Bob Shults/HOU/ECT on 08/16/2000 11:18 AM --------------------------- Louise Kitchen 08/04/2000 08:43 AM To: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Mark Schroeder/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: new counterparties for EOL? Bob - please pursue, you will need to talk to Mark Taylor as there were regulatory issues with the funds. Thanks Mark - we'll pursue - hope things are well with you too. All is going fine here. Mark Schroeder 03/08/2000 03:49 To: Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: John Sherriff/LON/ECT@ECT Subject: new counterparties for EOL? Louise - I think that John indicated to me that he had or would be suggesting to you that hedge funds might be a group of counterparties to get online with EOL. I have also suggested to John, and pass along to you now, an additional/different group. Lately, I have been receiving proxies from a number of the mutual funds (the equivalent of your unit trusts and investment trusts in the UK) I own (some with the Fidelity funds family in Boston, some with the AIM funds, based in Houston [but with a UK parent]), seeking (and receiving) shareholder authorisation to trade in commodities. Particularly given the cost pressures on mutual funds these days, the low-cost option of EOL would seem a good product for them. Anyway, in the event that you had not targetted this potentially large number of counterparties and funds, I wanted to pass along this suggestion/idea. Hope all is going well. mcs
|