Enron Mail

From:mark.taylor@enron.com
To:martin.rosell@enron.com
Subject:Re: Commodity Trading Advisor
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:40:00 -0700 (PDT)

Very good question - while you don't need to worry about otc swaps, otc
options might be a problem. However, if the customer is not a US entity, the
advice is all given outside the US and does not relate to US futures or
options, we feel reasonably comfortable that the risk is quite low that there
would be a problem.




Martin Rosell
06/24/99 10:08 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Commodity Trading Advisor

Thanks for the response. Does the term "futures contract" also include
bilateral swaps (or it restricted to exchange-traded futures) and will it
make any difference if the couterparty/customer is a non-US entity?!

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 24/06/99 16:06
---------------------------


Mark - ECT Legal Taylor
24/06/99 16:53
To: Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Re: Commodity Trading Advisor

I think the answers will be the same for Stockholm - i.e. as long as we are
not giving advice with respect to futures contracts (valuations or trading
advice) or handling customer funds there should not be any Commodity Exchange
Act issues.



Martin Rosell
06/14/99 09:08 AM
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Commodity Trading Advisor

Mark, the business people posted at ECTRIC's office in Stockholm want to
offer a Swedish forestry group portfolio management services and advisory
services. With reference to our previous conversations on the subject below,
do you think that this may entail problems under US securities laws?!

Martin
---------------------- Forwarded by Martin Rosell/OSL/ECT on 14/06/99 15:05
---------------------------


Martin Rosell
28/04/99 16:05
To: Mark - ECT Legal Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Commodity Trading Advisor

Mark:

Did you have any luck with your New York law firm contact. The other party
has accepted the contents of the contract and wish to sign on Tuesday next
week, why it's a bit urgent to flag any US securities law implications
associated with the relevant transaction.

Martin