![]() |
Enron Mail |
That's fine with me - we're taking that approach on the "override" letters
that override existing master agreements. Stacy E Dickson 11/30/99 10:13 AM To: Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Re: Letter for Utilities in Texas Mark, I am fine with the user not signing. It is your call though. Stacy ---------------------- Forwarded by Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT on 11/30/99 10:12 AM --------------------------- David Forster 11/30/99 08:08 AM To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT, Mark Taylor/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Letter for Utilities in Texas Stacy/Mark, Can we revise the Texas Utilities letter so that the user does not need to sign, but accepts the amendment by transacting on the website? As we have hordes of customers asking for User ID's, it would be appreciated if we could land on a final, legal-approved draft of the letter, combined with a list of affected customers for this morning. Thanks, Dave ---------------------- Forwarded by David Forster/LON/ECT on 30/11/99 14:05 --------------------------- David Forster 26/11/99 19:31 To: Stacy E Dickson/HOU/ECT@ECT cc: Bob Shults/HOU/ECT@ECT Subject: Re: Letter for Utilities in Texas Stacy, Can we revise the text down to the following? Dear [Customer]: Please be advised that all U.S. physical natural gas transactions that you enter into with EnronOnline will be with Enron North America Corp. regardless of anything to the contrary on the website or in any General Terms and Conditions, if applicable. This leter will be sent with the User ID, so it doesn't really require much of an introductory sentence. Dave Stacy E Dickson 22/11/99 20:33 To: David Forster/LON/ECT@ECT cc: Subject: Letter for Utilities in Texas Dave, Attached is the letter that we discussed. Please give me your comments. Stacy
|