|
|
Enron Mail |
I wasn't sure if this was distributed. As you know the NYISO with LECG did a
pretty good critical review of the problems with the MIRANT study, most of which I agreed with. However, I also thought that from a back of the envelope perspective MIRANT had come up with a reasonable number using a non-supportable methodology. PJM has apparently revisited the issue. They have tried to estimate regional savings from an integrated commitment and energy market. They did this for a single year, 2001. They ran GEMAPS. The data for the system topology and contingencies was obtained from all three ISO's. They used RDI data on generator costs. The results are striking and a summary is attached. While I am sure we are going to see more argument and debate about the data, the transactions baseline etc., this is a pretty good first cut at what is at stake. The general methodology is correct, and the data doesn't seem too bad to me. It would make sense for the NYISO to again take a look at this so that all of the participants can evaluate the implications if there are indeed $600 million of potential production cost savings for NY. Roy J. Shanker 9009 Burning Tree Road Bethesda, MD 20817 301-365-3654 301-365-3657 FAX 301-332-0486 NEW CELL royjshanker@worldnet.att.net - NERTOSAVINGS.pdf --- You are currently subscribed to nyiso_tie as: paul.d.thomas@enron.com To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-nyiso_tie-629431H@lyris.nyiso.com
|