RE: EPNG Proposal II

that was today... I had heard they were sniffing around about optionality values?

It is not in the agreement. just a question.

-----Original Message-----
From: Whitt, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 3:18 PM
To: Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: RE: EPNG Proposal II

We decide to leave out the $ value in order to focus them on the structure. I do not see the conversation about option values on the pipe?

-----Original Message-----
From: Tycholiz, Barry
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 2:10 PM
To: Whitt, Mark
Subject: FW: EPNG Proposal II

I thought we were going to show them a number to work with.... What is this conversation about option values on the pipe?

BT

-----Original Message-----
From: Nemec, Gerald
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 4:37 PM
To: Fuller, Dave; Whitt, Mark
Cc: Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: RE: EPNG Proposal II

Attached is the document with one change.

<< File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II1.doc <<

-----Original Message-----
From: Fuller, Dave
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 2:56 PM
To: Whitt, Mark
Cc: Nemec, Gerald; Miller, Stephanie; Tycholiz, Barry
Subject: EPNG Proposal II

All,

Here is a draft document for BP, please review and comment.

Dave

<< File: EPNG Capacity Proposal II.doc <<