Re: akzo

I agree with the way you wnat to change the deal in the system (i.e. making
the 1125 MMBtu * # of days/month the first gas through the meter on a monthly
basis rather than a daily basis) is the correct way to do it. That is what
the client expects and it will be difficult to get money out of them based on
the other way. Kim might want to contact the client if she wants to use the
daily approach for future business.

C

Isabel Y Resendez
01/31/2001 10:29 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: akzo

Thank you I will speak to her about the new deal, but would she be the one
to tell me about the old deal? This is A/R issues for December 2000 and
before.
isable

To: Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Kim Ward/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: Re: akzo

I:

Kim Ward in Houston x3-0685 is taking over management of this account. My
understanding of the new deal is that the fixed price deal expires 12/31 and
Kim has renegotiated the arrangment at index + .05/MMBtu. Please contact her
to confirm.

Thanks

C

Isabel Y Resendez
01/31/2001 09:09 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECt
cc: Lisa Valderrama/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: akzo

Chris,
I am back to this issue. I have been told that the way we can fix the a/r
issues is to change the way the deal is entered in sitara. I wanted to make
sure you agree with the change. The way the deal is entered now is
1,125 daily and the rest at the NGI index.
The days that Akzo takes less than the 1,125 the volumes allocation changes.
Making the system want to charge them more since it adds more volumes to the
NGI price.

I was wondering if we can change the deal to:
1,125 * #of days in month @ $2.6676
remaning volume @ $NGI index.
This way it reflex the way ENA has invoice Akzo(since Akzo takes the require
1,125 on a monthly basis.

Please e-mail me back letting me know if this change agrees with how you
wanted Akzo to be invoice and that will reflex how Akzo has been invoice.
thanks
isabel
713-853-0440

---------------------- Forwarded by Isabel Y Resendez/HOU/ECT on 01/31/2001
10:59 AM ---------------------------

Isabel Y Resendez
10/19/2000 09:40 AM
To: Chris H Foster/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc: Audrey Cook/HOU/ECT@ECT
Subject: akzo

Good morning Chris,
I have a question on Akzo's invoicing. Since we invoice Akzo manually I am
trying to reconcile the system with what we have invoice Akzo.
The way we are invoicing them is that we assume that they take the 1125 mmbtu
daily. However, there is one or two days of each month(almost) that they
take less than the 1125/day. That changes the numbers. As it looks I may
have to go back and do PMA invoices to invoice them balance. I wanted to
speak with you on this before I actually do anything. Here is an example:

August manual invoice:
34,875 @ 2.6676 = $93,032.55
24,520 @ 4.4775 = $109,790.09
Total $202,822.64

System Invoice:
34,633 @ 2.6676 = $92,386.99
24,762 @ 4.4775= $110,871.86
Total $203,258.85

Difference $436.21
The reason to the difference in volume is that on 8/8 only 883 mmtu flowed.

The balance is not a big one but it is over my limit to overwrite.
My questions is do you want me to go back and send Akzo PMA invoices???
Give me a call if you need to speak to me about this.
thanks
isabel