Enron Mail |
I have this on my agenda for later today. If I get back to you late today is that OK?
C Enron Capital & Trade Resources Corp. From: CoganJA@aol.com 04/16/2001 08:16 AM To: sbreen@czn.com, cfoster@enron.com cc: Subject: Griffith Sales Proposal Good morning, Hope you had a great Easter weekend. Attached are two (2) word files for your review. First, there is the latest draft of the Sales Proposal which reflects the best efforts and intra day provisions. Second, there is the Alternate Nominations provisions. I spoke with PPL this morning and said that I would try to get both of these documents to them today. Your timely review and comments are greatly appreciated. The Alternate Nominations language is being separately provided at the request of PPL so that they can review it. If they would like to have it incorporated, it can easily incorporated into the proposal and/or agreement. Chris, I used the working draft of the Enron/Citizens agreement from our meeting last Monday in Houston to draft the Alternate Nominations language. That draft did not provide for a price differentiation for nominations between 8:30 and 9:00 am CPT. Should there be one? Best regard, John John A. Cogan Johnco Group 3629 Lake Kristin Drive Gretna, LA 70056 Phone (504) 392-7557 Cell (504) 491-2874 Fax (208) 730-4713 - PPL - Griffith Gas Sales Proposal-rev 4-6-01 Amend 4-16-01.ZIP
|