Enron Mail

From:lbracken@summitenergy.com
To:kim.ward@enron.com
Subject:Re: Smurfit Stone
Cc:mbaker@summitenergy.com
Bcc:mbaker@summitenergy.com
Date:Thu, 25 Jan 2001 01:10:00 -0800 (PST)

Kim
Good morning.? I spoke with Jason yesterday afternoon.? Summit had the
Irvine plant's contract expiring at the end of April 2001.? The RFP we sent
out shows that the new contract start date is May 1, 2001 for that site.? I
will check the contract today to see what the situation is because Jason had
in his letter that the proposed deal would start March 1, 2001.
This site has a month to month deal and must have had a notification date,
which I will look into.
Also, we have compiled information for another Smurfit site that is on
tariff.? Every month, we paid less for the tariff customer, which has less
usage, than for Irvine.
I can show you that information if you would like. I brought up this issue
with Jason, and he said we could look at switching to a fixed rate.? This
doesn't really solve the problem.? I had wanted to look into the possibility
of switching back to tariff for that customer. It seems that for the smaller
customers, tariff is the better option.? Certainly for the month of December
(I haven't even seen that bill), it would've been the better choice.?
I did want to review the pricing for the larger Smurfit facilities also.?
When you get a chance, please give me?a call.?
Thanks Kim!
Lynn
----- Original Message -----
From: Kim.Ward@enron.com
To: Lynn Bracken
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: Smurfit Stone


Lynn,

I received your message after you left today.? Jason is from our retail
company who does serve some of Smurfit's box plants.? I have left a message
with him to discuss your RFP and what make sense for us to do.? We may need
to split things up between the box plants and the Mill.? Call me when you
get a chance and hopefully I will have had a discussion with him.

Thanks,

Kim