|
|
Enron Mail |
In that case, it's just the SoCalGas core procurement charge (including
brokerage fee -- e.g. their March price was $7.404/dth) that we need to be comparable to or beat. We have more control over the transmission rates so the price from Enron we are looking for is just for the commodity at the border. I'll provide you with our monthly WACOG that customers are charged as the commodity portion of their bill versus SoCalGas' core procurement charge. I'll be sending you the data today. Kim.Ward@enron.com wrote: < Bonnie, < < Sorry I am just now getting back - I was out of the office Thurs & Fri. < What I am trying to determine is the rate that Long Beach wants to beat and < what it is made up of - so I would say both transmission and commodity < prices. Let me know if you have any more questions - < < Thanks, < < Kim Ward < 713-853-0685 < < "Bonnie Ying" <boying@ci.long-beach.ca.us< on 03/22/2001 05:10:21 PM < < To: Kim.Ward@enron.com < cc: Chris Garner <chgarne@ci.long-beach.ca.us<, Cynthia Gonzales < <cygonza@ci.long-beach.ca.us< < Subject: Request for Information < < Kim, just a clarification on the last question of your data request -- < < By historical retail rates vs. SoCal's rates, do you mean the < transmission rates or the commodity prices?
|