![]() |
Enron Mail |
Cc: rick.dietz@enron.com, dennis.lee@enron.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bcc: rick.dietz@enron.com, dennis.lee@enron.com X-From: Brown, Elizabeth </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=EBROWN1< X-To: Giambrone, Laura </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lgiambr<, Hernandez, Bert </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ahernan<, McEvoy, Christine </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cmcevoy<, Miller, Beverly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Bmiller1<, Miller, Christopher L </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Cmiller6<, Minter, Tracy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tminter<, Mulligan, Amy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Amullig<, Ward, Linda </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Lward<, Donoho, Lindy </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Ldonoho<, Lindberg, Lorraine </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Llindbe<, Lohman, TK </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Tlohman<, Lokay, Michelle </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Mlokay<, Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Kwatson<, McConnell, Mark </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MMcConne<, Y'barbo, Paul </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Pybarbo<, Buchanan, John </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Jbuchan2< X-cc: Dietz, Rick </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Rdietz<, Lee, Dennis </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Dlee< X-bcc: X-Folder: \Kim_Watson_Mar2002\Watson, Kimberly\Capacity Release X-Origin: Watson-K X-FileName: kwatson (Non-Privileged).pst Attached is the file to be used for demand invoice verification for January 2002 capacity release transactions. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. FYI - Based on the flash invoices I generated last night for the capacity release transactions and global settlement contracts, please note the following: ENA K #24924 Res - manual rate adjustment is needed for the 50/50 split of marketing fees for capacity released to Burlington Conoco K #20748 Res - delete the Thoreau to E. Thoreau line item Conoco K #20835 Comm - delete authorized overrun line items and roll volumes up to the commodity charge type Texaco K #25923/25924 Comm - when verifying fuel rate of 4.5% between the lateral and mainline contract sched volumes, there is a ldifference that could not be attributed to rounding. Need to verify if difference is caused by makeup volumes; and if delivery makeup scheduled, then invoice should be adjusted accordingly. Please remember that the notes above are based on data as of 2/26/02. I will review again on the 1st. Schedulers - Please provide a final copy of the delivery tolerance report to both me and Marketing so it can be determined if makeup will affect the rate to be charged [some contracts are based on calculations, especially when charging incremental fees for alternate point usage]. Thanks, Elizabeth x3-6928
|