|
|
Enron Mail |
Here's what I noticed in researching the points listed below:
Point # Point Name Template Comment 6828 NGPL Gray County Panhandle Receipts Delivery Already exists under PHDEL template 8143 TW/Seven M Gas Sherman CO. I/C Panhandle ReceiptsDelivery Already exists under PHDEL template 9028 Delhi Cheyenne Panhandle Receipts Point has term date of 11/18/98 9278 TW/NNG Hutchinson Cactus Lateral Panhandle Receipts/Delivery Already exists under PHDEL and PHREC template (as bi-directional pt) 12354 Dominion Gas/Tule Lake I/C CE9Receipts Already exists under CE9REC template 13855 Getty Fed "24" #1 West Texas Receipts Point has term date of 11/18/98 15409 Jones Trust #44-565 CMP Panhandle Receipts Point has term date of 11/18/98 56943 Valero Ward West Texas ReceiptsDelivery Already exists under WTDEL template 57096 Northwest Bloomfield San Juan Receipts Is this point valid any longer? 58710 PNM Thompson CE9ReceiptsDelivery Already exists under CE9DEL template 500517 Delhi Ward I/C West Texas ReceiptsDelivery Already exists under WTDEL template 500540 El Paso Blanco I/C San Juan 2 ReceiptsDelivery Should not be added to a template since they were set up as alt pt on each contract (until we move to new system) 3531 TW/NNG Beaver Panhandle Deliveries Already exists under PHDEL template 500176 Dale Ferguson Tap Panhandle Deliveries Needs to be added to PHDEL template 500203 Continental Follette Panhandle Deliveries Needs to be added to PHDEL template 500390 Sum WTG Delivery Pt Panhandle Deliveries Already exists under PHDEL template Lindy - Could you verify if POI #57096 is still valid for any reason? Ramona - It appears that some of these points are available for displacement. In the new system, Linda indicated that a separate group has been set up for any points you have identified as valid. I will assume then that these should not be added to the paired template (ie, if a delivery point allows displacement, then they will only be added to the related basin delivery template. Nominating this point as a receipt would depend on the displacement grouping defined in the new system for pools and interruptibles.). Thanks, Elizabeth -----Original Message----- From: Lee, Dennis Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 1:48 PM To: Bastida, Nancy; Brostad, Karen; Brown, Elizabeth; Carter, Zuela; Eldridge, Dale; Lee, Dennis; Trevino, Linda; Lohman, TK; Lindberg, Lorraine; Donoho, Lindy; Watson, Kimberly; Y'barbo, Paul; McConnell, Mark; Lokay, Michelle; Frazier, Perry; Matthews, Ron; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Kowalke, Terry; Buchanan, John; Betancourt, Ramona Subject: TW Contract Template Clean-up In cleaning up some template information, the following points were found to be on no templates. 1. Do they belong on a template? 2. Is the template listed the correct one? Unless I hear differently, I will go ahead and update the templates accordingly. Point # Point Name Template 6828 NGPL Gray County Panhandle Receipts 8143 TW/Seven M Gas Sherman CO. I/C Panhandle Receipts 9028 Delhi Cheyenne Panhandle Receipts 9278 TW/NNG Hutchinson Cactus Lateral Panhandle Receipts 12354 Dominion Gas/Tule Lake I/C CE9Receipts 13855 Getty Fed "24" #1 West Texas Receipts 15409 Jones Trust #44-565 CMP Panhandle Receipts 56943 Valero Ward West Texas Receipts 57096 Northwest Bloomfield San Juan Receipts 58710 PNM Thompson CE9Receipts 500517 Delhi Ward I/C West Texas Receipts 500540 El Paso Blanco I/C San Juan 2 Receipts 3531 TW/NNG Beaver Panhandle Deliveries 500176 Dale Ferguson Tap Panhandle Deliveries 500203 Continental Follette Panhandle Deliveries 500390 Sum WTG Delivery Pt Panhandle Deliveries Dennis P. Lee ETS Gas Logistics (713) 853-1715 dennis.lee@enron.com
|