Enron Mail

From:tk.lohman@enron.com
To:ramona.betancourt@enron.com
Subject:RE: TW Firm Contracts
Cc:kimberly.watson@enron.com, lindy.donoho@enron.com
Bcc:kimberly.watson@enron.com, lindy.donoho@enron.com
Date:Wed, 30 Jan 2002 07:57:52 -0800 (PST)

Ramona, let's add the PNR POI's that are within the path. Lindy and I discussed that if a shipper wants to Park or Ride this would mean more revenue for TW. Let's do it now and eliminate the hassle of adding them later.

Thanks,

TK

-----Original Message-----
From: Betancourt, Ramona
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:53 AM
To: Betancourt, Ramona ; Donoho, Lindy
Cc: Lohman, TK; Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: TW Firm Contracts

Lindy, TK or Kim,

Have you guys come up with a solution on this issue yet? Please let me know.
Thanks Ramona

-----Original Message-----
From: Betancourt, Ramona
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Donoho, Lindy
Cc: Lohman, TK; Watson, Kimberly
Subject: TW Firm Contracts

Lindy,

While testing the new CMS TW contract system, we have come across situations with the firm contracts & PNR points. We need to know how marketing sets up the PNR points on firm contracts.

Do you want all valid PNR points within the path, to be added as alternate receipt & delivery points on every firm contract or do you add the PNR points only on request form the customer? Looking at most of the Firm contracts in production today, I do not see many PNR points attached as alternate points.

Please let us know how we should handle PNR points for firm contracts?

Thanks Ramona