FW: K #27291 - Invoices not capturing incremental fees for

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-From: Watson, Kimberly </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=KWATSON<
X-To: Lindberg, Lorraine </O=ENRON/OU=NA/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Llindbe<
X-cc:
X-bcc:
X-Folder: \KWATSON (Non-Privileged)\Watson, Kimberly\Sent Items
X-Origin: Watson-K
X-FileName: KWATSON (Non-Privileged).pst

Lorraine, would you please check on this. Thanks, Kim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Brown, Elizabeth
Sent: Sat 9/22/2001 10:58 PM
To: Watson, Kimberly; Blair, Lynn; Dietz, Rick; Donoho, Lindy
Cc:
Subject: K #27291 - Invoices not capturing incremental fees for alternate points

FYI - In working to load rates for the FERC California reporting requirements, it appears that for the last four months Duke Energy T & M contract #27291 has not been billed the incremental fee of $0.06/dth for alternate deliveries to the Cal Border (over and above the base discount negotiated for the contracted primary points).

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Elizabeth
x3-6928