Enron Mail

From:kimberly.watson@enron.com
To:lindy.donoho@enron.com
Subject:FW: draft answer
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:21:25 -0700 (PDT)



-----Original Message-----
From: Fossum, Drew
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Pavlou, Maria; Van Norden, Mike; 'sstojic@gbmdc.com'; Kirk, Steve; Porter, Gregory J.; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; 'cmoore@akingump.com'; Miller, Mary Kay; 'fkelly@gbmdc.com'; Harris, Steven; Watson, Kimberly
Subject: RE: draft answer

Great draft Maria. I couldn't resist adding some stuff. Remember Kathy's transcript correction? Barry's testimony originally read exactly like Kathy's protest--they both demanded that released capacity and our own capacity be posted "on the same platform" whatever that means. The correction added "on the same page" to the "same platform" concept. I inserted a paragraph that suggested that the Indicated Shippers aren't sure what the hell they want and keep changing their story so should be ignored. Cut it if you like but it was amusing. DF




-----Original Message-----
From: Pavlou, Maria
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Van Norden, Mike; 'sstojic@gbmdc.com'; Kirk, Steve; Porter, Gregory J.; 'rnuschler@akingump.com'; 'cmoore@akingump.com'; Fossum, Drew; Miller, Mary Kay
Subject: draft answer

<< File: RP01-507 Answerind.doc <<

We may want to make further clarifications to Section 13 and offer that up. Pls. let me know what you think. Thanks, Maria