![]() |
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron on 03/19/2001 02:05
PM --------------------------- From: Jason R Williams/ENRON@enronXgate on 03/19/2001 12:17 PM To: James Ledlow/ENRON@enronXgate, Bradford Larson/ENRON@enronXgate, Lynn Bellinghausen/ENRON@enronXgate, Becky Caudle/ENRON@enronXgate, Tanya Rohauer/ENRON@enronXgate, Eric Boyt/Corp/Enron@Enron cc: Subject: Neumin Production - REVISED POSITIONS Neumin Team - As you know, I have been trying to sort out a problem that we have regarding trade N52632 with Neumin Production. The issue surrounded the expiration dates of the various legs of this trade, with confusion about whether those legs were to expire in December '01 or December '02. At the present, it is the general consensus of the Confirms/Origination teams that the legs in question (legs 2 & 4) should expire at the end of December '01. I say "general consensus" because we have no clear, concrete evidence that this expiration is correct. Our own internal systems show a lot of conflicting indications, so the long and the short of this "investigation" is that we are relying on the memories of our originators to verify the terms of the deal. So, attached is the Neumin position spreadsheet, with updated terms for legs 2 and 4. I have also added a sheet that shows Neumin's production profile, based on the reserve report of 1/1/01. Included on this sheet is a "Net Overhedge" calculation which shows the amount of hedged production above projected production (as of 1/1/01). Please let me know if you have any questions. Jay
|