Enron Mail

From:mike.coleman@enron.com
To:charles.weldon@enron.com, matthew.tezyk@enron.com
Subject:RE: Fuel Oil Vanadium Spec
Cc:mark.breese@enron.com, ed.mcmichael@enron.com, mathew.gimble@enron.com,david.fairley@enron.com, ron.tapscott@enron.com, bill.fox@enron.com, frank.hosak@enron.com, darrell.stovall@enron.com, ray.mcphail@enron.com
Bcc:mark.breese@enron.com, ed.mcmichael@enron.com, mathew.gimble@enron.com,david.fairley@enron.com, ron.tapscott@enron.com, bill.fox@enron.com, frank.hosak@enron.com, darrell.stovall@enron.com, ray.mcphail@enron.com
Date:Mon, 21 May 2001 06:52:14 -0700 (PDT)

I believe we probably have a miscommunication here. I think somewhere we've mistaken 0.05% by weight with 0.05 ppm.

Vanadium is a heavy metal that falls out in the residual oil, and is typically not an issue with No. 2 oil. That's why it's not usually in the spec for No. 2.

Bill Fox: Please check and see where the 0.05% came from regarding MHI, and confirm that it's not ppm. In the meantime, everyone should assume that vanadium is not an issue with regard to the gas turbine using No. 2 fuel.

Thanks!

Mike