![]() |
Enron Mail |
Change in MTM assumptions. Numbers were finalized on Oct 1.
Martha -----Original Message----- From: Hernandez, Nancy Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:26 PM To: Stevens, Martha Cc: Luong, Anita Subject: RE: Reconciliation of Schedule B values What kind of change? Was that change not worked into the Spreadsheet Model? Regards, Nancy -----Original Message----- From: Stevens, Martha Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 3:25 PM To: Hernandez, Nancy Subject: RE: Reconciliation of Schedule B values Nancy, The ($3,384,713) difference was due to a change to the Modesto Maranzana power plant. Martha -----Original Message----- From: Hernandez, Nancy Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 11:30 AM To: Stevens, Martha Subject: Reconciliation of Schedule B values Importance: High Martha: We are in the process of trying to resolve the differences in values reported by the various units on Schedule B as compared to the values our automated process generated. The EI-ARG-PWR-PRC book had such a difference. Attached is a file downloaded from RisktRAC with all the dealleg information. Can you please review these values to you file and reconcile the difference between your report ($1559137) and ours $1825575.80. Thanks for you help. Please let me know if I can provide you any addition information. Regards, Nancy << File: SAdealleg0901.xls <<
|