Enron Mail

From:diana.scholtes@enron.com
To:bill.williams@enron.com
Subject:FW: Adjust Function
Cc:
Bcc:
Date:Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:50:00 -0700 (PDT)

Bill,
=20
Not sure if this is impacting us now, but I'm sure it will in the future! =
Currently only the LCA has the adjust function capability, and only until 1=
.7 implementation will the PSE's have the capability to Adjust. Until then=
, I believe we need the LCA's to co-operate with the PSE's, otherwise this =
will create unwanted workload to your group and others alike. Please give m=
e some feedback. Not sure if you've been added to the discussion email lis=
t. =20
=20
Diana
-----Original Message-----
From: Rice, Paul [mailto:Paul.Rice@Pacificorp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 1:00 PM
To: Interchange Scheduling & Accounting Subcommittee (ISAS)
Subject: Adjust Function




PacifiCorp Real-Time has recently been requested several times by PSE's to =
use their "Adjust" function for changing schedules. This has prompted them=
to ask for a clarification on the Adjust function "rules". It is Real-Tim=
es belief that the Adjust function is for Control Area use and only for Rel=
iability/Curtailment issues. If Merchants/PSE's want to change a schedule =
on an existing tag it should be done through the Termination/replaced funct=
ions at their control and not ask C/A's to use their Adjust function. I ha=
ve found documentation that tells who has control of the Adjust function an=
d how it can be used but cannot find any documentation that specifically pr=
ohibits or limits it's use to C/A and/or their curtailment issues. Does an=
ybody have any help here?? The main issue is, R/T does not have time to pe=
rform adjust functions for other entities merely at their request. We can=
understand doing it when the tag originator has lost control and is unable=
to terminate a tag but not on a routine basis.