|
|
Enron Mail |
Ad Hoc'ers:
One last time before we shoot it over to Mark and ISAS. Thanks for the comments, good catches. <<tag time table draft_rev3.doc<< As far as comment #1 (LCA vs. PPT vs. PST), this gets into the white paper idea discussed last Wednesday. Lisa was going to tackle this (she's given-up sleeping to fit it in) and I'd asked her to distinguish between referencing time in a product definition versus time in a process description. But I believe she is on vacation fighting forest fires. This table is used in a process (submission and assessment of E-Tags) and is some-what independent of the time zone(s) that the product or commodity is referenced by. Guess I'm letting my preference slip in here - since we are dealing with a daily process, the timing table should use a prevailing time reference (e.g., LCA or PPT, etc.) and not a "fixed" time zone (e.g., PST, CST, etc.). Enough of me, let's talk about your comments to the latest table. If there are none, it'll go to Mark at COB Tuesday July 3rd. Robert Harshbarger Puget Sound Energy OASIS Trading Manager 425.882.4643 (desk) 206.604.3251 (cell) - tag time table draft_rev3.doc
|