Enron Mail

From:bharsh@puget.com
To:mons'.'ellingson@enron.com, demetrios'.'fotiou@enron.com,lisa'.'grow@enron.com, susan'.'holden-baker@enron.com, chris'.'smith@enron.com, carmine'.'tilghman@enron.com, john'.'underwood@enron.com, bill.williams@enron.com
Subject:RE: A3A1 Ad Hoc Review Team
Cc:'hackney@enron.com, mhackney@apsc.com
Bcc:'hackney@enron.com, mhackney@apsc.com
Date:Tue, 22 May 2001 11:49:45 -0700 (PDT)

Timeliners:

Revision to yesterday's e-mail - due date is end of July. So proposals by
mid-June, first draft report by early/mid-July, discussion throughout.

Bob

< ----------
< From: Harshbarger, Robert
< Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 5:16 PM
< To: Ellingson, Mons; Fotiou, Demetrios; Grow, Lisa; Holden-Baker, Susan;
< Smith, Chris; Tilghman, Carmine; Underwood, John; Williams, Bill
< Cc: 'Hackney, Mark'
< Subject: A3A1 Ad Hoc Review Team
<
< Yes, that's right, you did raise your hand for this.
<
< We are to submit to ISAS any recommendation(s) by August ??, 2001 (what
< was the date, I didn't write it down).
<
< Is there benefit to have a face-to-face meeting? Either way, we'll use
< e-mail for discussion and maybe a conference call or two.
<
< First assignment is to read:
< * A3A1-Interim is what we are currently running with.
< * A3A1-version3-draft2 goes before the NERC BOT June 10-11.
< * A3A1-candr contains public comments and responses from NERC IS.
<
< <<File: a3a1-interim.doc<<<<File: a3a1v3d2-0501.doc<<<<File:
< a3a1candr.doc<<
< Questions to keep in mind:
< * Are our current timelines as good as it gets?
< * Do we want to adopt the Eastern Interconnection's timelines?
< * What are the deficiencies of our timelines?
< * Will these deficiencies be present under 1.7?
< * Which timing requirements could be changed with an reasonable amount
< of effort (i.e., tariff items, AGC ramp times, A3A1, etc.)?
<
< Remember....
< <<File: trainedpros.wav<<
<
< Bob Harshbarger
< OASIS Trading Manager
< Puget Sound Energy
< (425) 882-4643 voice
< (425) 882-4496 fax
< (206) 405-5161 pager
< (206) 604-3251 cell
<