![]() |
Enron Mail |
-----Original Message----- From: Almeida, Keoni [mailto:KAlmeida@caiso.com] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 2:20 PM To: Williams III, Bill Subject: A/S inter-SC trade Scenario 1 EPMI makes a forward deal with Duke to provide its "obligation" for A/S. Essentially EPMI is trading off its "obligation" to Duke using inter-SC template which references the SC (Duke) that is taking on the obligation. No energy is scheduled by EPMI, just the indication that the obligation is going to Duke. The energy curve is scheduled by Duke only. EPMI can not schedule the energy. Duke is responsible for providing the energy and receiving the payment or No Pay. Although, Duke has various options as to how they will take care of the traded obligation. Suffice it to say EPMI only has to trade their obligation and it is then Duke's obligation to deal with as they choose. If Duke chooses to let the ISO provide for that obligation then there would not be any energy or No-Pay issues. Scenario 2 EPMI has a resource within its portfolio that will self provide the obligation for A/S. EPMI puts in a schedule indicating which resource, the capacity that will be self provided, and the energy that will be bid in. EPMI recieves the payment for the energy and any No Pay charges. Hope this helps. Keoni Almeida California Independent System Operator phone: 916/608-7053 pager: 916/814-7352 alpha page: 9169812000.1151268@pagenet.net e-mail: <mailto:kalmeida@caiso.com<
|