|
|
Enron Mail |
---------------------- Forwarded by Dan Masters/HOU/ECT on 03/07/2001 09:37
AM --------------------------- Dan Masters 03/05/2001 09:34 AM To: "Joseph McKechnie" <jmckechnie@cabotlng.com< @ ENRON cc: "Christopher Skinner" <cskinner@cabotlng.com<@ENRON, Jaime.Sanabria@enron.com@ENRON, Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com@ENRON, Todd.Peterson@enron.com@ENRON, "Rudy Adamiak" <radamiak@cabotlng.com<@ENRON, "Jane Michalek" <jmichalek@cabotlng.com<@ENRON Subject: Re: Feb 12 delivery of "Methane Arctic" Joe- It would have been preferable to work these numbers out in advance rather than after the fact, especially considering that it seems we already had by our phone conversations and my email to you dated February 7. Since we received no correspondence to the contrary, I assumed the numbers to be used would be per that email. Please revert with your response. Dan "Joseph McKechnie" <jmckechnie@cabotlng.com< on 03/05/2001 08:22:30 AM To: Dan.Masters@enron.com cc: "Christopher Skinner" <cskinner@cabotlng.com<, Jaime.Sanabria@enron.com, Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com, Todd.Peterson@enron.com, "Rudy Adamiak" <radamiak@cabotlng.com<, "Jane Michalek" <jmichalek@cabotlng.com< Subject: Re: Feb 12 delivery of "Methane Arctic" Dan: We have rechecked our numbers and offer the following. Based on The Matthew's original delivery to Eco in July 2000 she delivered 2,744.094 mmbtu's. This is the base number we are working with. The Arctic delivered 1,415,921 mmbtu's 5/6 feb 2001, She then delivered 1,389,086 mmbtus on the 12/13th of feb 2001, for a total of 2,805,007 mmbtus delivered. We subtract 2,744,094 (matthew base number) from 2,805,007 and get 60,913 mmbtus remaining, which we will bill at the $3.483097 rate. We will be re-submitting the invoice upon receipt of you comments Brgds Joe McKechnie Dan.Masters@enron.com on 02/27/2001 09:18:11 PM To: Joseph McKechnie/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG, Christopher Skinner/Cabot LNG@Cabot LNG cc: Jaime.Sanabria@enron.com, Paul.Y'Barbo@enron.com, Todd.Peterson@enron.com Fax to: Subject: Re: Feb 12 delivery of "Methane Arctic" Joe/Chris- I have received your invoice for the Feb 13 delivery of the "Methane Arctic". I do not agree with the split as it appears on the invoice. For the Winter Cargo portion billed at $4.323264, there should be 55,924.321m (superscript: 3) which corresponds to 1,252,745 MMBtu. The remainder to be billed at $3.483097 is 6,086.467m(superscript: 3) which corresponds to 136,341 MMBtu. Please recheck your figures and revert. Thank you, Dan Masters Dan Masters 02/07/2001 04:07 PM To: jmckechnie@cabotlng.com cc: Subject: Feb 12 delivery of "Methane Arctic" Joe- Confirming our conversation, since the "Winter Cargo" is being delivered on two Methane Arctics, we need to paper split the volumes on the 2nd one between the winter cargo price and normal price. Using the volumes for a standard cargo from the contract, the winter cargo should be 119,000 m (superscript: 3). The delivery that just finished was 63,075.679 m (superscript: 3). That leaves 55,924.321m(superscript: 3) on the next delivery to be priced at the winter cargo rate and the remainder to be priced at the normal rate. Thanks, Dan Masters Office: 713-345-5498 Fax: 713-646-6560 Cell: 832-326-9590 Email: dan.masters@enron.com - att1.eml
|