Enron Mail |
Karim, I don't want to wait till month end, let's adjust the numbers now and for the June 29 2nd order, lets take that value into June since it relates to July puts.
-----Original Message----- From: Punja, Karim Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 2:23 PM To: Postlethwaite, John; Meira, Marcelo Cc: Gupta, Sanjay; Chen, Hai; Zufferli, John Subject: RE: Option liq Hi everyone, I just got of the phone with Hai and he told me how to make an adjustment on a day to day basis in regards to incorrect liquidations but he also explained this is just to make the daily P&L #'s right, if nothing were done the month end P&L would still somehow work out because adjustments would be made. Does this mean that for June and for a certain portion of July we should not do anything and just make adjustments on a going forward basis (and assume everything will work out at month end)? If this is the case I would like someone to walk me through June to see if the numbers did really work themselves out as there was a large swing in second order on June 29 that was not adjusted for. Let me know if one of you could help me do this. Karim. -----Original Message----- From: Postlethwaite, John Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 2:09 PM To: Meira, Marcelo Cc: Gupta, Sanjay; Punja, Karim; Chen, Hai Subject: RE: Option liq Evidently, this a problem that Stacey White has been aware of for a couple of months now. There was a change made in the coding for the delta position and this has somehow messed up the liq value. John -----Original Message----- From: Meira, Marcelo Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:07 PM To: Postlethwaite, John Cc: Gupta, Sanjay; Punja, Karim; Chen, Hai Subject: RE: Option liq John, Karim, I'm now looking closely at the option liquidation problems. I believe that there might be a sign-flipping problem for PUTS that 's causing this whole issue. I'll keep you posted. Karim - this's likely the explanation to your other question... I'll get back to you as soon as I have more info (hopefully later today) Marcelo L. Meira Sr IT Developer Enron Networks - Houston, TX (713) 345-3436 -----Original Message----- From: Postlethwaite, John Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:28 PM To: Meira, Marcelo Cc: Gupta, Sanjay; Punja, Karim Subject: Option liq The post id I am looking at for Calgary is 11608. I am looking at the option liquidation report and all of the $65 puts are in the money and the $75 call is also in the money. Shouldn't all the liquidation values from the beginning of the month be a negative (representing positive liquidation) for the puts? The liq value for the call is CORRECT. John
|